Nội dung
Section 1: What are Simultaneous Equations Models (SEM)?
Definition of Simultaneous Equations Models
Overview of SEM: Systems of equations where endogenous variables are determined simultaneously.
Key distinction: SEM vs. single-equation models.
Examples of SEM in practice: Supply and demand models, macroeconomic policy models.
Simultaneity and Endogeneity
Definition of simultaneity: Situations where one variable affects another, and vice versa.
Endogeneity in SEM: How endogenous variables are correlated with the error term.
Examples of simultaneity in economics: Price and quantity determination in the market.
The Importance of SEM in Econometrics
Why SEM is used: Addressing simultaneity bias and recursive relationships.
Applications of SEM in real-world settings: Labor supply and demand, consumption and investment models, financial markets.
Section 2: Structural Form and Reduced Form in SEM
Structural Form of SEM
What is the structural form? Representation of relationships between endogenous variables and exogenous variables.
Example: Structural equations in a supply-demand system.
Reduced Form of SEM
Definition of reduced form: Expressing endogenous variables as a function of only exogenous variables.
Converting structural equations into reduced form equations.
Example: Reduced form of a simultaneous demand and supply system.
Comparison Between Structural Form and Reduced Form
Role of structural form in representing economic theory.
Role of reduced form in prediction and policy analysis.
How to interpret reduced form coefficients.
Section 3: Simultaneity Bias and Endogeneity
Understanding Simultaneity Bias
Definition of simultaneity bias: How the correlation between endogenous variables and error terms leads to bias in Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimation.
Illustration of bias using a simple two-equation model (e.g., supply and demand).
Endogeneity in SEM
Sources of endogeneity: Omitted variables, measurement error, simultaneity.
How endogeneity impacts the consistency of OLS estimates in SEM.
The Need for Special Estimation Methods
Why OLS is inappropriate for SEM.
Motivation for using alternative estimation methods: Instrumental variables (IV), Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS), and other methods.
Sách
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data (No. 64). Cambridge university press.
Baltagi, B. H., & Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 4, pp. 135-145). Chichester: Wiley.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using stata (Vol. 2). College Station, TX: Stata press.
Greene, W. (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th Edition
Schmidt, P. (1976). Econometrics Marcel Dekker. New York.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics (Vol. 63). New York: Oxford.
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Identification in Simultaneous Equations Models
What is Identification?
Definition of identification: The ability to uniquely estimate the parameters of the structural model.
Importance of identification in SEM: Ensuring the model is well-defined and estimable.
Difference between identified, under-identified, and over-identified models.
Consequences of identification issues: Bias, inconsistency, and inability to make valid inferences.
How identification differs between single-equation models and simultaneous equations models.
Reduced Form and Its Implications for Identification
Definition and derivation of the reduced form from the structural form.
How the reduced form helps express endogenous variables as functions of only exogenous variables.
Example: Reduced form equations for a basic SEM.
Section 2: The Order Condition for Identification
Order Condition: A Necessary but Not Sufficient Condition
Explanation of the order condition for identification.
Formula: The number of excluded exogenous variables must be at least equal to the number of endogenous variables minus one.
Example: Applying the order condition to a system of two equations (e.g., supply and demand).
Examples of Order Condition in Simple SEM
Case of just-identified, over-identified, and under-identified models.
Practical illustration using a two-equation model (e.g., investment and GDP).
Section 3: The Rank Condition for Identification
Rank Condition: A Necessary and Sufficient Condition
Definition and importance of the rank condition.
Rank condition in matrix terms: The matrix of excluded instruments must have full rank.
Application of the Rank Condition
Step-by-step process to check the rank condition.
Examples: Testing the rank condition for both just-identified and over-identified models.
Practical Implications of the Rank Condition
The role of instrumental variables in satisfying the rank condition.
How failure to meet the rank condition leads to identification problems.
Section 4: Identified, Under-Identified, and Over-Identified Models
Identified Models
Definition of just-identified models: When the number of excluded exogenous variables satisfies both the order and rank conditions.
Example: Identified model in a simple macroeconomic system (e.g., income determination).
Under-Identified Models
Definition and consequences of under-identification: Not enough information to uniquely estimate structural parameters.
Examples of under-identified models: Failure to exclude enough exogenous variables.
Over-Identified Models
Definition of over-identification: More excluded exogenous variables than required for identification.
Implications for estimation: Testing over-identifying restrictions.
Example: Over-identified model in a monetary policy system (e.g., interest rate targeting and inflation control).
Section 5: Testing for Identification
Tests for Over-Identification
Sargan-Hansen test for over-identifying restrictions.
Practical steps for applying the test in SEM.
Testing for Rank Condition
Methods for testing the rank condition in practice.
How to interpret test results for identifying whether the system is under-identified, just-identified, or over-identified.
Section 6: The Role of Instruments in Identification
Definition and Purpose of Instrumental Variables
What makes a valid instrument: Exogeneity and relevance.
Role of instruments in satisfying identification conditions.
Choosing and Testing Instruments for Identification
Guidelines for selecting appropriate instruments.
Tests for instrument validity: Relevance (F-statistics) and exogeneity (Sargan test).
Sách
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data (No. 64). Cambridge university press.
Baltagi, B. H., & Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 4, pp. 135-145). Chichester: Wiley.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using stata (Vol. 2). College Station, TX: Stata press.
Greene, W. (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th Edition
Schmidt, P. (1976). Econometrics Marcel Dekker. New York.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics (Vol. 63). New York: Oxford.
Bài báo
Klein, L. R. (1950). Economic fluctuations in the United States, 1921-1941.
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Estimation in Simultaneous Equations Models
Why standard Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is inappropriate in SEM due to endogeneity and simultaneity bias.
The need for specialized estimation techniques to account for simultaneity.
Role of Identification in Estimation
Importance of identification in SEM estimation.
Brief review of order and rank conditions as prerequisites for estimation.
Estimation Methods Overview
Summary of the key estimation techniques for SEM: Instrumental Variables (IV), Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS), Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS), Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods.
Section 2: Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Its Limitations in SEM
OLS in the Context of SEM
Why OLS leads to biased and inconsistent estimates in simultaneous equations models.
Simultaneity Bias
Illustration of simultaneity bias using an example of supply and demand estimation.
Mathematical demonstration of why OLS fails when endogenous variables are correlated with error terms.
Practical Example of OLS Failures in SEM
Case study: Estimation of supply and demand using OLS and the resulting bias.
Section 3: Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
The Role of Instrumental Variables in SEM
Definition of instrumental variables (IV): How they solve the endogeneity problem in SEM.
Conditions for valid instruments: Relevance and exogeneity.
Estimating SEM with IV
Steps for implementing IV estimation in SEM.
Example: Using IV to estimate a supply-demand system with price as an endogenous variable.
Testing Instrument Validity
Methods for testing the relevance (F-statistics) and exogeneity (Sargan test) of instruments.
Practical example: Applying validity tests to a real-world SEM model.
Section 4: Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)
What is Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)?
Overview of the 2SLS method: A solution to endogeneity in SEM.
How 2SLS works: First stage (predicting endogenous variables using instruments) and second stage (estimating the structural equation).
Step-by-Step Procedure for 2SLS
First stage: Regressing endogenous variables on exogenous variables and instruments.
Second stage: Estimating the structural equation using predicted values from the first stage.
Examples of 2SLS Estimation
Case study: Applying 2SLS to estimate the effect of education on wages (labor supply and demand model).
Properties of the 2SLS Estimator
Consistency, asymptotic normality, and efficiency of the 2SLS estimator.
Limitations of 2SLS
Issues such as weak instruments, small sample bias, and inefficient estimates.
Section 5: Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS)
Introduction to Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS)
Definition of 3SLS: Simultaneous estimation of all equations in a system, accounting for cross-equation correlations.
The advantage of 3SLS over 2SLS: Efficiency gains from joint estimation and accounting for error term correlations.
Steps in 3SLS Estimation
First stage: Estimating reduced form equations using instrumental variables.
Second stage: Computing the covariance matrix of residuals.
Third stage: Generalized least squares (GLS) estimation using the covariance matrix.
Example of 3SLS Estimation
Case study: Applying 3SLS to estimate a system of equations for monetary policy (interest rate, inflation, and output).
Properties of the 3SLS Estimator
Efficiency of 3SLS compared to 2SLS.
When to use 3SLS: Advantages and potential limitations.
Section 6: Limited Information Maximum Likelihood (LIML)
Overview of LIML Estimation
What is LIML? Estimation method for single equation systems within SEM using a likelihood approach.
How LIML differs from 2SLS: Its ability to handle small sample bias better than 2SLS.
Theoretical Framework of LIML
How to derive the LIML estimator.
Example of LIML Estimation
Applying LIML to a supply and demand system: Comparison with 2SLS results.
Advantages and Limitations of LIML
When to prefer LIML over 2SLS: Small sample efficiency.
Limitations: Computational complexity and availability of alternative estimators.
Section 7: Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML)
Introduction to Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML)
What is FIML? Estimation method that uses the entire system of equations in SEM simultaneously.
Difference between FIML and LIML: FIML uses information from all equations in the system.
FIML Estimation Process
Estimating structural equations by maximizing the likelihood function of the entire system.
Example of FIML Estimation
Case study: Applying FIML to a multi-equation system for economic growth and inflation.
Properties of the FIML Estimator
Efficiency of FIML compared to 2SLS and 3SLS.
FIML as a small-sample efficient estimator.
Limitations of FIML
Computational challenges: FIML can be complex and may not converge in certain cases.
Section 8: Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) in SEM
What is Generalized Method of Moments (GMM)?
Introduction to GMM: A flexible estimation technique that generalizes the method of moments for SEM.
Why use GMM in SEM? Advantages in handling heteroskedasticity and instrument proliferation.
GMM Estimation in SEM
How GMM works: Using moment conditions to estimate parameters.
GMM Example in SEM
Case study: Estimating a system of equations for firm investment and output using GMM.
Properties of GMM Estimators
Consistency and efficiency of GMM estimators under different assumptions.
Practical Challenges in GMM
Weak instruments, overfitting with too many moment conditions, and the curse of dimensionality.
Section 9: Choosing the Right Estimation Technique for SEM
Criteria for Choosing Estimation Methods
When to use IV, 2SLS, 3SLS, LIML, FIML, or GMM.
Practical considerations: Sample size, instrument quality, error correlations, and computational complexity.
Trade-offs Between Efficiency and Complexity
Balancing efficiency (FIML, 3SLS) with simplicity and computational feasibility (2SLS, LIML).
Section 10: Practical Applications of SEM Estimation Techniques
Estimating Demand and Supply Systems
Example: Using 2SLS and 3SLS to estimate a simultaneous supply-demand system.
Policy Evaluation Using SEM
Example: Estimating the effects of fiscal and monetary policies using FIML and GMM.
Estimating Macroeconomic Models
Example: Joint estimation of inflation, output, and unemployment using 3SLS or FIML.
Section 11: Software Implementation of SEM Estimation Techniques
Implementing 2SLS and 3SLS in Stata
Stata commands: ivregress, reg3, and sem for 2SLS and 3SLS estimation.
LIML and FIML in R
Using systemfit package in R for LIML and FIML estimation.
GMM Implementation in Stata and MATLAB
GMM estimation using Stata (gmm) and MATLAB (gmmest).
Section 12: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Summary of Estimation Techniques
Recap of key estimation methods: IV, 2SLS, 3SLS, LIML, FIML, and GMM.
Best Practices for Estimation in SEM
Guidelines for choosing the appropriate estimation technique based on the problem at hand.
Future Directions in SEM Estimation
Emerging techniques and computational advancements in the field of SEM estimation.
Sách
Greene, W. (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th Edition
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics (Vol. 63). New York: Oxford.
Klein, L. R. (1950). Economic fluctuations in the United States, 1921-1941.
Baldwin, S. A. (2019). Psychological statistics and psychometrics using Stata (p. 454). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Bài báo
Zellner, A. (1962). Three stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equtions. Econometrica, 30, 63-68.
Iwasaki, I., Ma, X., & Mizobata, S. (2024). Board structure in emerging markets: A simultaneous equation modeling. Journal of Economics and Business, 128, 106160.
Salvatore, D. (2023). A simultaneous equations model of the relationship between international trade, and economic growth and development with dynamic policy simulations. Journal of Policy Modeling, 45(4), 789-805.
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing in SEM
Why hypothesis testing is crucial in SEM: Validating model assumptions and testing relationships between variables.
Types of hypotheses in SEM: Testing for structural relationships, over-identification, endogeneity, and more.
Testing the exclusion of variables (zero restrictions).
Testing for structural parameter constraints across equations.
Tests related to endogeneity, over-identification, and validity of instruments.
Section 2: Testing for Endogeneity in SEM
2.2 Hausman Test for Endogeneity
Overview of the Hausman test: Comparing OLS and IV/2SLS estimators to detect endogeneity.
Steps to perform the Hausman test in SEM.
Interpretation of results: Accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis of exogeneity.
2.3 Practical Example of the Hausman Test
Case study: Testing for endogeneity in a simultaneous system of demand and supply.
Section 3: Over-Identification and Testing the Validity of Instruments
Over-Identification in SEM
Definition of over-identification: More instruments than necessary for identification.
The importance of testing over-identifying restrictions to ensure valid estimation.
Sargan Test for Over-Identifying Restrictions
Overview of the Sargan test: A test of the validity of the over-identifying restrictions.
Steps to implement the Sargan test after IV/2SLS estimation.
Interpretation of results: Whether the instruments are valid or invalid.
Hansen’s J-Test for Over-Identification
Introduction to Hansen's J-test: A robust version of the Sargan test for over-identifying restrictions.
Practical implementation of Hansen’s J-test in the presence of heteroskedasticity.
Practical Example of Sargan and Hansen Tests
Case study: Testing for the validity of instruments in an investment and output model.
Section 4: Hypothesis Testing for Cross-Equation Restrictions
Testing Cross-Equation Parameter Constraints
Definition of cross-equation restrictions: When parameters are expected to be the same across different equations.
Examples of cross-equation constraints in SEM: Testing if coefficients are equal across equations (e.g., income elasticity across demand and supply equations).
Wald Test for Cross-Equation Restrictions
Overview of the Wald test: Testing joint hypotheses about parameter restrictions across equations.
Steps to implement the Wald test in SEM: Formulating the null and alternative hypotheses.
Interpreting Wald test results: Whether to reject or fail to reject cross-equation restrictions.
Likelihood Ratio Test for Cross-Equation Constraints
Using the Likelihood Ratio (LR) test to evaluate restrictions across equations.
Steps for implementing the LR test: Estimating the unrestricted and restricted models.
Lagrange Multiplier (LM) Test
Application of the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test to test for cross-equation restrictions in SEM.
Practical advantages and limitations of the LM test in SEM.
Example of Cross-Equation Restriction Testing
Case study: Testing for parameter equality in a labor supply and demand system.
Section 5: Testing for Exclusion Restrictions
Exclusion Restrictions in SEM
What are exclusion restrictions? Hypotheses about whether certain variables should be excluded from one or more equations.
The importance of exclusion restrictions for identification and model specification.
Wald Test for Exclusion Restrictions
Implementing the Wald test to check if certain variables should be excluded from the SEM.
Example: Testing whether interest rates should be excluded from a consumption equation.
Likelihood Ratio Test for Exclusion Restrictions
Likelihood Ratio test as a means to test exclusion restrictions: Comparing restricted and unrestricted models.
Example of Exclusion Restriction Testing
Case study: Testing exclusion restrictions in a model of inflation and unemployment.
Section 6: Testing for Structural Breaks in SEM
Structural Breaks in SEM
Definition and examples of structural breaks: Policy changes, economic shocks, or regime changes that may alter the relationships between variables.
Chow Test for Structural Breaks
Overview of the Chow test: A test to detect structural breaks at known breakpoints.
Steps to implement the Chow test: Splitting the data and testing for parameter stability across sub-samples.
CUSUM and CUSUMSQ Tests for Parameter Stability
Application of CUSUM (Cumulative Sum) and CUSUMSQ (Cumulative Sum of Squares) tests to detect parameter instability over time.
Example of Structural Break Testing
Case study: Testing for structural breaks in a model of monetary policy before and after a financial crisis.
Section 7: Testing for Heteroskedasticity and Serial Correlation in SEM
Heteroskedasticity in SEM
The importance of detecting heteroskedasticity in SEM: Potential bias in standard errors and hypothesis tests.
Breusch-Pagan Test for Heteroskedasticity
Implementing the Breusch-Pagan test to check for heteroskedasticity in the SEM.
Testing for Serial Correlation
Durbin-Watson and Breusch-Godfrey tests for serial correlation in SEM.
Importance of detecting and addressing serial correlation in time series SEM.
Example of Testing for Heteroskedasticity and Serial Correlation
Case study: Testing for heteroskedasticity and serial correlation in a system of macroeconomic equations.
Section 8: Goodness-of-Fit Tests in SEM
Measuring the Overall Fit of SEM
Assessing the goodness-of-fit in SEM models: R-squared, adjusted R-squared, and root mean squared error (RMSE).
Chi-Square Test for Model Fit
Application of the chi-square test for evaluating the overall fit of SEM models.
Example of Goodness-of-Fit Testing
Case study: Evaluating the fit of a SEM model of economic growth and trade.
Section 9: Software Implementation of Hypothesis Testing in SEM
Hypothesis Testing in Stata
Hypothesis Testing in R
Hypothesis Testing in EViews
Section 10: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Recap of Hypothesis Testing Methods in SEM
Summary of key hypothesis testing methods: Endogeneity, over-identification, exclusion restrictions, cross-equation restrictions, and structural breaks.
Importance of Rigorous Hypothesis Testing in SEM
Why hypothesis testing is essential for validating SEM models and ensuring robust estimation.
Looking Ahead to Diagnostic Testing
Transition to the next chapter on diagnostic testing and model validation in SEM.
Sách
Greene, W. (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th Edition
Schmidt, P. (1976). Econometrics Marcel Dekker. New York.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics (Vol. 63). New York: Oxford.
Acock, A. C. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata. Stata Press Books.
Bài báo
Thomson, E., & Williams, R. (1982). Beyond wives' family sociology: A method for analyzing couple data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 999-1008.
Iwasaki, I., Ma, X., & Mizobata, S. (2024). Board structure in emerging markets: A simultaneous equation modeling. Journal of Economics and Business, 128, 106160.
Salvatore, D. (2023). A simultaneous equations model of the relationship between international trade, and economic growth and development with dynamic policy simulations. Journal of Policy Modeling, 45(4), 789-805.
Phần mềm
Stata: Brief Overview of Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata’s SEM (link)
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems
What Are Recursive Systems?
Definition of recursive systems in SEM: Systems where each equation can be solved sequentially without feedback between equations.
Key characteristics: No simultaneity; one-way causality between variables.
Examples: Income determination models, production function models.
What Are Block-Recursive Systems?
Definition of block-recursive systems: Systems of equations where blocks of equations can be estimated separately, with interactions only within blocks.
Example: A multi-sector economy with independent sectoral relationships within each block.
Comparison Between General SEM, Recursive Systems, and Block-Recursive Systems
Differences in complexity, estimation techniques, and feedback structures.
When to use recursive and block-recursive systems over fully simultaneous models.
Section 2: Theoretical Foundations of Recursive Systems
2.1 Structure of Recursive Systems
General form of recursive systems.
Sequential relationship between endogenous variables: One-way causality from higher-order to lower-order equations.
Identification in Recursive Systems
Why identification is easier in recursive systems: No simultaneity means that standard OLS can be applied.
Order of identification: Estimation proceeds step by step, solving each equation sequentially.
Economic Applications of Recursive Systems
Examples of recursive models:
Keynesian income determination model.
Recursive models of consumption and savings behavior.
Section 3: Estimation Techniques for Recursive Systems
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) for Recursive Systems
Why OLS is consistent and efficient in recursive systems.
Steps for estimating recursive systems using OLS.
Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation in Recursive Systems
When IV is needed in recursive systems: Dealing with potential endogeneity of exogenous variables.
Example: Estimating a recursive consumption model with endogenous income.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) in Recursive Systems
Overview of MLE as an estimation technique for recursive systems.
When MLE offers advantages over OLS.
Section 4: Practical Examples of Recursive Systems
Recursive Macroeconomic Models
Example: A recursive model of consumption, investment, and output determination.
Recursive Labor Market Models
Example: A recursive labor supply and demand model where wage determination influences employment.
Recursive Financial Models
Example: Recursive models of asset pricing and investment, where past returns influence current investment decisions.
Section 5: Theoretical Foundations of Block-Recursive Systems
Structure of Block-Recursive Systems
General form of block-recursive systems: Systems of equations grouped into blocks, with equations within each block being interdependent, but no feedback between blocks.
Definition of blocks: A set of equations where endogenous variables interact within the block but are not influenced by other blocks.
Identification in Block-Recursive Systems
Identification within blocks: How identification works within a block of equations.
Estimation within blocks vs. across blocks: Simpler estimation due to no feedback across blocks.
Economic Applications of Block-Recursive Systems
Examples of block-recursive models:
Multi-sector models of the economy where different sectors (e.g., agriculture, industry) are modeled as separate blocks.
Block-recursive models of education and labor markets.
Section 6: Estimation Techniques for Block-Recursive Systems
Estimating Each Block Independently
Step-by-step procedure for estimating each block of equations separately using OLS, IV, or 2SLS.
Efficiency of estimation within blocks compared to fully simultaneous systems.
Generalized Least Squares (GLS) Estimation in Block-Recursive Systems
Using GLS to estimate block-recursive systems when error terms are correlated within blocks.
Example: Applying GLS to estimate the relationship between different sectors of the economy in a block-recursive system.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) in Block-Recursive Systems
MLE techniques for estimating block-recursive systems.
Advantages of MLE over OLS when error terms are correlated across blocks or when there are complex interactions within blocks.
Section 7: Practical Examples of Block-Recursive Systems
Block-Recursive Macroeconomic Models
Example: Estimating a block-recursive model of the economy where production and consumption are modeled as separate blocks.
Block-Recursive Sectoral Models
Example: A multi-sector model where agriculture, manufacturing, and services are modeled as separate blocks.
Block-Recursive Financial Models
Example: Estimating a block-recursive system for different financial markets (e.g., equity market, bond market, and currency market).
Section 8: Hypothesis Testing in Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems
Testing for Exogeneity in Recursive Systems
Using Hausman tests and other techniques to check for endogeneity in recursive systems.
Testing Cross-Equation Restrictions in Block-Recursive Systems
Wald tests, Likelihood Ratio tests, and Lagrange Multiplier tests for testing cross-equation restrictions within blocks.
Example of Hypothesis Testing in Recursive and Block-Recursive Models
Practical example: Testing parameter restrictions in a recursive model of consumption and savings.
Section 9: Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems with Time Series Data
Dynamic Recursive Systems
Incorporating lagged variables into recursive systems to capture dynamic relationships.
Example: A dynamic recursive model of consumption and investment over time.
Block-Recursive Time Series Models
Applying block-recursive systems to time series data: Estimating different blocks over time.
Example: A block-recursive system of economic sectors with time-varying effects.
Testing for Stability and Structural Breaks in Recursive Systems
Using Chow tests, CUSUM tests, and CUSUMSQ tests to check for parameter stability and structural breaks in recursive and block-recursive systems.
Section 10: Software Implementation for Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems
Estimating Recursive Systems in Stata
Estimating Block-Recursive Systems in Stata
Estimating Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems in R
Section 11: Applications and Extensions of Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems
Recursive Systems in Policy Evaluation
Example: Using recursive systems to evaluate the impact of fiscal and monetary policy.
Block-Recursive Systems in Development Economics
Example: Estimating a block-recursive system to study interactions between education, health, and labor markets.
Extensions of Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems
Extensions to nonlinear models: Recursive systems with nonlinear relationships.
Example: Estimating a nonlinear recursive model in environmental economics.
Section 12: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Summary of Key Concepts in Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems
Recap of the benefits and limitations of recursive and block-recursive systems compared to general SEM.
Best Practices for Estimation and Model Specification
Guidelines for specifying and estimating recursive and block-recursive systems in practice.
Future Directions in Recursive and Block-Recursive Systems
Discussion of emerging trends and advanced applications in recursive and block-recursive SEM.
Sách
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data (No. 64). Cambridge university press.
Baltagi, B. H., & Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 4, pp. 135-145). Chichester: Wiley.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using stata (Vol. 2). College Station, TX: Stata press.
Greene, W. (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th Edition
Schmidt, P. (1976). Econometrics Marcel Dekker. New York.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics (Vol. 63). New York: Oxford.
Bài báo
Phần mềm
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Generalized Structural Equation Models (GSEM)
Definition and overview of GSEM: A flexible extension of structural equation models (SEM) that accommodates non-normal distributions, categorical variables, and more complex relationships.
Key differences between SEM and GSEM: GSEM as a more general framework that allows for non-Gaussian distributions and mixed models.
Motivation for GSEM: When traditional SEM assumptions of normality and linearity are violated.
Practical applications of GSEM: Educational testing, healthcare, latent class analysis, and finance.
Examples of GSEM in economics, social sciences, and other disciplines: Modeling categorical and count data, and handling latent variables.
Section 2: Theoretical Foundations of GSEM
Generalized Linear Models (GLM) and GSEM
Review of GLM: Framework for modeling non-normal distributions (e.g., logistic regression, Poisson regression).
Extension of GLM to GSEM: Allowing for latent variables and simultaneous equations in models with non-normal data.
Mixed Effects Models and GSEM
Incorporating mixed models into GSEM: Fixed and random effects in a structural equation framework.
Examples: Random intercepts and slopes in hierarchical data (e.g., panel data or longitudinal studies).
Latent Variables and GSEM
Incorporating latent variables in GSEM: Modeling unobserved constructs using indicators.
Applications: Latent traits in psychology, risk preferences in finance.
Section 3: Model Specification in GSEM
Structural and Measurement Equations in GSEM
Defining structural and measurement equations in GSEM.
Specifying relationships between endogenous and exogenous variables in generalized models.
Nonlinear and Non-Normal Models
Handling nonlinear relationships in GSEM: Modeling interactions and quadratic terms.
Example: Nonlinear effects of income on health outcomes using GSEM.
Model Setup for Categorical and Count Data
How to specify models with categorical, binary, and count data in GSEM.
Example: A GSEM model with logistic regression for binary outcomes and Poisson regression for count data.
Section 4: Estimation Techniques for GSEM
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) in GSEM
Overview of MLE for GSEM: Estimating parameters in models with non-normal data.
Challenges and advantages of MLE in GSEM: Dealing with categorical variables, non-normality, and mixed models.
Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation (QMLE)
Introduction to QMLE: A flexible estimation technique when traditional likelihood assumptions do not hold.
Example: Applying QMLE to a GSEM with count and categorical variables.
Bayesian Estimation in GSEM
Overview of Bayesian estimation for GSEM: Incorporating prior distributions and obtaining posterior estimates.
Applications of Bayesian methods: Handling complex models, missing data, and latent variables in GSEM.
Section 5: Goodness-of-Fit and Model Diagnostics in GSEM
Assessing Goodness-of-Fit in GSEM
Criteria for model fit: Likelihood ratio tests, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).
Assessing fit for models with non-normal data: Adjusted chi-square tests, pseudo R-squared, and deviance statistics.
Residual Diagnostics in GSEM
Analyzing residuals for model adequacy: Checking for overdispersion, misspecification, and non-linearity.
Example: Residual analysis in a Poisson-based GSEM for count data.
Testing for Model Misspecification
Testing hypotheses in GSEM: Wald tests, Likelihood Ratio tests, and Lagrange Multiplier tests.
How to handle potential model misspecifications in GSEM: Detecting omitted variables and incorrect functional forms.
Section 6: Practical Examples of GSEM
GSEM for Binary Data
Example: Logistic regression in a GSEM framework for modeling binary outcomes, such as the probability of a household defaulting on a loan.
GSEM for Count Data
Example: Using Poisson regression within a GSEM to model the number of doctor visits as a function of socioeconomic factors.
GSEM with Latent Variables
Example: Estimating a GSEM with latent variables for consumer satisfaction using multiple indicators and categorical outcomes.
Section 7: Advanced Topics in GSEM
Multilevel and Hierarchical GSEM
Incorporating multilevel data into GSEM: Handling clustered data with random effects.
Example: A hierarchical GSEM for modeling school performance across different regions.
Handling Missing Data in GSEM
Methods for handling missing data in GSEM: Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML), multiple imputation, and Bayesian methods.
Example: A GSEM model for health outcomes with missing covariate data.
Longitudinal Data in GSEM
Extending GSEM to model longitudinal data: Accounting for time-varying covariates and outcomes.
Example: GSEM applied to panel data of labor market outcomes over time.
GSEM for Complex Survey Data
Accounting for survey weights and design effects in GSEM.
Example: GSEM with stratified survey data on household income and spending behavior.
Section 8: Hypothesis Testing in GSEM
Testing Parameter Constraints
Wald tests and Likelihood Ratio tests for testing constraints on parameters in GSEM.
Example: Testing for the equality of effects across groups in a GSEM.
Cross-Equation Hypothesis Testing
Testing cross-equation constraints in GSEM: Applying joint hypothesis tests to multiple equations.
Example: Testing whether income affects health outcomes and education simultaneously in a GSEM.
Testing for Interaction Effects
Specifying and testing for interaction terms in GSEM: Understanding nonlinear relationships between variables.
Example: Interaction between education and income in predicting health status.
Section 9: Software Implementation of GSEM
Implementing GSEM in Stata
Stata commands for estimating GSEM models: Using the gsem command.
Example: Step-by-step guide to estimating a GSEM with logistic and Poisson models in Stata.
GSEM in R
Using R packages (lavaan, MplusAutomation, brms) to estimate GSEM.
Example: Implementing a GSEM for longitudinal data using lavaan in R.
Section 10: Applications of GSEM in Different Fields
GSEM in Economics
Example: Estimating a GSEM for household consumption decisions with categorical outcomes and latent variables.
GSEM in Education
Example: Modeling student performance with multilevel data and latent traits using GSEM.
GSEM in Health and Social Sciences
Example: Using GSEM to model health outcomes with latent health status indicators and count data on medical visits.
Section 11: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Recap of GSEM Key Concepts
Summary of GSEM advantages: Flexibility in handling categorical data, mixed models, and latent variables.
Best Practices for GSEM Estimation and Interpretation
Practical guidelines for specifying, estimating, and interpreting GSEM models.
Future Directions in GSEM Research
Emerging trends: GSEM with machine learning, deep learning extensions, and applications in big data contexts.
Sách
Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. STATA press.
Acock, A. C. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata. Stata Press Books.
Corrado, L. (2005). Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models.
Bollen, K. A. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons.
Bài báo
Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2009). Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 172(3), 659-687.
Goodman, L. A. (2002). Latent class analysis: The empirical study of latent types, latent variables, and latent structures. Applied latent class analysis, 3-55.
Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods, ed. T. D. Little, vol. 2, 551–610. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bentler, P. M., & Raykov, T. (2000). On measures of explained variance in nonrecursive structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 125.
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations Models
Definition of NSEM: Simultaneous equations where at least one equation is nonlinear in parameters or variables.
Importance of NSEM: Addressing real-world phenomena that involve nonlinearity in economic relationships.
Comparison of linear SEM and NSEM: Nonlinearity in functional form, estimation complexity, and model behavior.
Practical examples of nonlinear relationships: Production functions, demand curves, utility maximization.
Applications of NSEM
Common applications in economics: Demand and supply systems, production functions, dynamic optimization models.
Case study: Nonlinear production and cost functions in firm behavior analysis.
Section 2: Theoretical Foundations of NSEM
Structure of Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations
General form of NSEM
Types of nonlinearity: Nonlinearity in variables, nonlinearity in parameters, or both.
Nonlinearities in Economic Theory
Overview of common sources of nonlinearity in economics:
Production functions: Cobb-Douglas, CES functions.
Consumption and utility functions: Logarithmic utility, CRRA (Constant Relative Risk Aversion) utility.
Investment models: Nonlinear adjustment costs.
Identification in NSEM
Identification issues in nonlinear models: Order and rank conditions for NSEM.
Importance of instrument choice: Dealing with the nonlinear structure for proper identification.
Section 3: Estimation Techniques for NSEM
Nonlinear Two-Stage Least Squares (NL2SLS)
Introduction to NL2SLS: Extending the two-stage least squares (2SLS) method to nonlinear equations.
Estimation procedure for NL2SLS: First stage for instrumenting endogenous variables, second stage for nonlinear estimation.
Nonlinear Three-Stage Least Squares (NL3SLS)
Extension of 3SLS to nonlinear models: Simultaneous estimation accounting for nonlinearity and cross-equation error correlations.
Steps for NL3SLS: Simultaneous estimation using generalized least squares (GLS) in the context of nonlinear systems.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) for NSEM
Using MLE for NSEM: Theoretical framework for estimating nonlinear models.
Advantages of MLE in NSEM: Efficient estimation under correct specification.
Example: Estimating a nonlinear demand-supply model using MLE.
eneralized Method of Moments (GMM) for NSEM
GMM in the context of nonlinear models: Estimating parameters using moment conditions derived from the nonlinear structure.
Two-step GMM and efficient GMM for NSEM: Step-by-step application of GMM to nonlinear systems.
Bayesian Estimation for NSEM
Bayesian techniques for estimating NSEM: Incorporating prior information and computing posterior distributions.
Applications of Bayesian methods to complex, nonlinear economic models.
Section 4: Hypothesis Testing and Diagnostics in NSEM
Testing for Nonlinearity
Wald, Likelihood Ratio, and Lagrange Multiplier tests for testing nonlinearity in the system.
How to determine if a model is better represented as nonlinear rather than linear.
Nonlinear Two-Stage Least Squares
Sargan-Hansen test for over-identifying restrictions in the context of nonlinear models.
Practical examples: Testing instrument validity in nonlinear demand and supply systems.
Residual Diagnostics in NSEM
Checking for model adequacy: Residual analysis, heteroskedasticity tests, and serial correlation tests.
Example: Testing for autocorrelation and heteroskedasticity in a nonlinear system of equations.
Section 5: Practical Examples of Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations Models
Nonlinear Demand and Supply Models
Case study: Estimating a nonlinear demand-supply system for agricultural commodities using NL2SLS.
Interpretation of results: Nonlinear price effects and elasticity estimation.
Nonlinear Production Functions
Estimating nonlinear production functions: CES (Constant Elasticity of Substitution) and Cobb-Douglas production models.
Example: Applying NSEM to estimate the effect of labor and capital on output in different sectors.
Nonlinear Dynamic Investment Models
Example: Estimating nonlinear models of firm investment behavior with adjustment costs using GMM.
Analysis of investment decisions and policy implications.
Section 6: Dynamic Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations Models
Dynamic Extensions of NSEM
Incorporating time dynamics into nonlinear models: Lagged variables, autoregressive terms, and time-varying coefficients.
Example: Nonlinear dynamic models of consumption and investment.
Nonlinear Error Correction Models (ECM)
Introduction to ECM in the context of nonlinearity: Modeling long-run relationships with nonlinear short-run adjustments.
Example: Nonlinear ECM for modeling trade balances and currency exchange rates.
Section 7: Nonlinear Systems with Latent Variables
Latent Variable Models in NSEM
Incorporating unobserved (latent) variables into nonlinear simultaneous equations.
Example: Modeling consumer preferences with latent factors and nonlinear demand equations.
Structural Equation Models with Nonlinearities
Extension of structural equation models (SEM) to incorporate nonlinear relationships between variables.
Applications in psychology, health economics, and education.
Section 8: Software Implementation for NSEM
8.1 Implementing NSEM in Stata
Commands for estimating NSEM in Stata
Example: Step-by-step guide for estimating a nonlinear demand system in Stata.
NSEM Estimation in R
Using the nlsystemfit package for nonlinear simultaneous equation estimation in R.
Example: Estimating a nonlinear production function with R.
NSEM Estimation in MATLAB
MATLAB’s fminunc and fmincon for estimating nonlinear systems with maximum likelihood and GMM.
Example: Dynamic nonlinear investment models using MATLAB.
Section 9: Applications of Nonlinear SEM in Different Fields
NSEM in Finance
Example: Estimating nonlinear risk-return relationships in financial markets using NSEM.
NSEM in Environmental Economics
Example: Nonlinear modeling of pollution and output with nonlinear production functions and environmental regulations.
NSEM in Health Economics
Example: Estimating nonlinear health production functions with latent health status and treatment effects.
Section 10: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Summary of Key Concepts in NSEM
Recap of nonlinearities in simultaneous equations, estimation techniques, and practical applications.
Best Practices for Estimation and Interpretation
Guidelines for choosing the appropriate estimation technique for NSEM and interpreting nonlinear relationships.
Future Directions in NSEM Research
Emerging trends: NSEM in machine learning, deep learning frameworks, and large-scale economic models.
Sách
Dhrymes, P. J. (2012). Topics in advanced econometrics: Volume II linear and nonlinear simultaneous equations. Springer Science & Business Media.
Bài báo
Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2007). Nonlinear structural equation modeling as a statistical method. In Handbook of latent variable and related models (pp. 321-343). North-Holland.
Adeline, A., & Moussa, R. K. (2020). Simultaneous Equations Model with Non-Linear and Linear Dependent Variables on Panel Data. Theoretical Economics Letters, 10(1), 69-89.
Phần mềm
Nội dung
Sách
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data (No. 64). Cambridge university press.
Baltagi, B. H., & Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 4, pp. 135-145). Chichester: Wiley.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using stata (Vol. 2). College Station, TX: Stata press.
Greene, W. (2012) Econometric Analysis. 7th Edition
Schmidt, P. (1976). Econometrics Marcel Dekker. New York.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics (Vol. 63). New York: Oxford.
Bài báo
Phần mềm
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Structural Equation Models (SEM)
Definition and overview of SEM: Combining factor analysis and multiple regression to model complex relationships between observed and unobserved (latent) variables.
The role of SEM in econometrics: Simultaneous estimation of multiple equations.
Use cases in various fields: Economics, psychology, sociology, marketing, and education.
Examples: Modeling consumer behavior, economic growth, psychological traits, and social relationships.
Advantages of SEM Over Traditional Models
Ability to model latent variables and measurement error.
Simultaneous estimation of interdependent relationships between multiple variables.
Greater flexibility and richer data analysis.
Section 2: Components of Structural Equation Models
The Measurement Model
Definition: Describing the relationships between latent variables and their observed indicators.
Reflective and formative indicators: Differences in how observed variables relate to latent constructs.
The Structural Model
Definition: Modeling relationships between endogenous and exogenous variables, whether observed or latent.
Path analysis: Direct and indirect effects between variables.
Exogenous vs. Endogenous Variables
Differentiating between exogenous (independent) variables and endogenous (dependent) variables in SEM.
Combining the Measurement and Structural Models
Integration of the measurement model and the structural model into a single system.
Example: A complete SEM for consumer satisfaction, including both measurement of satisfaction (latent variable) and its effect on purchase behavior.
Section 3: Model Specification in SEM
Specifying the Measurement Model
Defining relationships between observed indicators and latent variables.
Example: Measurement model for latent health status based on observed health indicators.
pecifying the Structural Model
Identifying relationships between variables in the system.
Structural paths: Direct and indirect effects in SEM.
Example: Specifying a structural model for firm performance based on latent organizational factors and external economic factors.
3.3 Model Identification
Order and rank conditions for identification in SEM.
Rules for ensuring that the model can be uniquely estimated.
Example: Identifying an over-identified vs. under-identified SEM.
Section 4: Estimation Techniques in SEM
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)
Description: The most commonly used estimation technique in SEM. MLE finds parameter estimates that maximize the likelihood of the observed data given the model.
Assumptions: Data is normally distributed; Large sample size is required for consistency.
Advantages: Produces efficient and asymptotically unbiased estimates under correct model assumptions.
Applications: Widely used in most SEM software like Stata, R (lavaan), and Mplus.
Generalized Least Squares (GLS)
Description: Minimizes a weighted sum of squared differences between the observed and predicted covariance matrices, accounting for heteroscedasticity.
Assumptions: Normally distributed data; Homoscedasticity (constant variance across observations).
Advantages: Can be used to address heteroskedasticity in SEM models ; Applications: SEM with large sample sizes, especially in models with measurement error.
Weighted Least Squares (WLS)
Description: A method that uses weights to account for differences in the precision of different estimates, suitable for non-normal data.
Assumptions: Often used when dealing with ordinal or non-normally distributed data.
Advantages: More robust to violations of normality.
Applications: SEM with non-normally distributed data, particularly in models with categorical or ordinal variables.
Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)
Description: A method used for SEM with endogenous variables. It first estimates predicted values for the endogenous variables and then uses these predicted values to estimate the structural equation.
Assumptions: Requires the identification of valid instrumental variables.
Advantages: Corrects for endogeneity in SEM models.
Applications: SEM models with simultaneous equations where endogeneity is present.
Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS)
Description: An extension of 2SLS that accounts for cross-equation error correlations. It estimates all the equations in the system simultaneously.
Assumptions: Assumes joint normality of errors across equations.
Advantages: Increases efficiency by considering correlations in the residuals between different equations.
Applications: Used in models with multiple equations where errors are correlated across equations.
Limited Information Maximum Likelihood (LIML)
Description: A variation of MLE that deals with systems of simultaneous equations but focuses on estimating single structural equations.
Assumptions: Data is normally distributed.
Advantages: LIML is less biased than 2SLS when there are weak instruments.
Applications: Models with simultaneous equations and weak instruments.
Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML)
Description: A method that estimates all model parameters simultaneously using all available data, even with missing values.
Assumptions: Requires the data to follow a multivariate normal distribution.
Advantages: Handles missing data more efficiently compared to traditional methods like listwise deletion.
Applications: SEM with incomplete datasets or missing data.
Bayesian Estimation
Description: A method that combines prior information with the observed data to estimate model parameters using Bayesian principles.
Assumptions: Requires specification of prior distributions for the parameters.
Advantages: Can handle small sample sizes, complex models, and missing data; Allows for greater flexibility in model specification and parameter estimation.
Applications: SEM with small samples, non-normal data, or models that involve latent variables and hierarchical structures.
Generalized Method of Moments (GMM)
Description: A flexible estimation technique that uses moment conditions derived from the model’s equations to estimate parameters.
Assumptions: Does not require normality of errors.
Advantages: Suitable for SEM with heteroskedasticity and other non-standard data distributions.
Applications: Used in SEM models dealing with panel data, heteroskedasticity, and endogeneity.
Asymptotically Distribution-Free (ADF) Estimation (also known as Weighted Least Squares)
Description: A robust technique used when data does not follow a normal distribution. It uses the asymptotic covariance matrix of the sample moments to perform estimation.
Assumptions: Assumes large sample sizes.
Advantages: Robust to violations of normality in the data.
Applications: SEM for ordinal or non-normal data, particularly when dealing with small samples.
Partial Least Squares (PLS)
Description: An alternative estimation technique to MLE, used primarily when the sample size is small, or the data does not meet distributional assumptions.
Assumptions: Does not assume normality or large sample sizes.
Advantages: Can handle complex models with many latent variables and small sample sizes.
Applications: Used in exploratory research or when theory development is still in its early stages. Widely used in marketing, management, and social sciences.
Robust Maximum Likelihood (MLR)
Description: A variation of MLE that provides robust standard errors and fit indices in the presence of non-normality or missing data.
Assumptions: Relaxes the assumption of multivariate normality.
Advantages: Accounts for non-normality and missing data without requiring the complete data matrix.
Applications: Suitable for SEM with non-normal data or missing values.
Summary of Estimation Techniques for SEM:
MLE, GLS, WLS: Suitable for large sample sizes, normally distributed data, or heteroscedasticity issues.
2SLS, 3SLS, LIML, FIML: Used for simultaneous equations, dealing with endogeneity, or missing data.
Bayesian Estimation, GMM: Useful for handling small samples, complex models, and non-normal data.
PLS, ADF, MLR: Alternatives to MLE for small samples, non-normal data, and robust estimation.
Section 5: Goodness-of-Fit and Model Diagnostics in SEM
Assessing Overall Model Fit
Goodness-of-fit measures: Chi-square, RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation), CFI (Comparative Fit Index), TLI (Tucker-Lewis Index).
Interpretation of goodness-of-fit indices and their thresholds.
Residual Diagnostics in SEM
Analyzing residuals to check for model adequacy and misspecification.
Checking for outliers, omitted variables, and incorrect functional forms.
Testing Hypotheses in SEM
Wald test, Likelihood Ratio test, and Lagrange Multiplier test for hypothesis testing in SEM.
Example: Testing the impact of a latent variable on an observed outcome.
Section 6: Practical Examples of SEM
Example 1: SEM for Consumer Behavior
Modeling consumer satisfaction and its effect on loyalty and repeat purchasing behavior.
Example 2: SEM for Economic Growth
Modeling economic growth using latent factors like innovation, education, and institutional quality, and their effects on GDP.
Example 3: SEM for Health Outcomes
Estimating the effects of latent health status on healthcare utilization and spending using multiple observed health indicators.
Section 7: Handling Latent Variables in SEM
Measurement of Latent Variables
Defining how latent variables are measured using observed indicators.
Example: Measuring latent risk preference using survey data.
Testing for Construct Validity
Convergent and discriminant validity: Ensuring that the model accurately reflects the latent variables being measured.
Example: Latent Variables in Educational Research
Using latent variables to model student engagement and academic performance based on survey data.
SEM in Economics
Example: Using SEM to model latent innovation and its impact on firm productivity.
SEM in Marketing
Example: Estimating brand loyalty as a latent construct and linking it to consumer behavior.
SEM in Psychology and Social Sciences
Example: Measuring latent psychological traits like depression and anxiety and their impact on life satisfaction.
Section 8: SEM for Panel Data
Extending SEM to Panel Data
Incorporating time-varying effects and individual-specific latent variables in SEM.
Example: Using SEM to analyze firm-level productivity over time.
Dynamic SEM
Introduction to dynamic SEM: Modeling temporal relationships between latent and observed variables.
Example: Estimating the dynamic relationship between financial risk and investment decisions using panel data.
Section 9: Multilevel SEM
Multilevel SEM Models
Modeling data at different levels (e.g., individuals within firms, students within schools).
Applications of multilevel SEM in educational and organizational research.
Estimation Techniques for Multilevel SEM
Maximum likelihood estimation for multilevel SEM.
Example: Multilevel SEM to analyze the effects of school-level factors on student academic outcomes.
Section 10: SEM with Missing Data
Handling Missing Data in SEM
Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) and Multiple Imputation techniques to deal with missing data.
Example: Estimating SEM with incomplete survey data.
Example: Dealing with Missing Health Indicators in SEM
Using FIML to estimate a health model where some indicators are missing for certain respondents.
Section 11: Extensions and Advanced Topics in SEM
Nonlinear SEM
Introduction to nonlinear SEM: Modeling non-linear relationships between latent and observed variables.
Example: Nonlinear SEM for modeling diminishing returns to education on income.
SEM with Interaction Effects
Modeling interaction terms between latent variables and observed variables in SEM.
Example: Estimating the interaction between job satisfaction (latent) and work hours on productivity.
Section 12: Software Implementation for SEM
SEM in Stata
Using Stata's sem and gsem commands to estimate SEM models.
Step-by-step guide to estimating a structural equation model in Stata.
SEM in R
Using the lavaan package in R to estimate SEM models.
Example: Estimating a SEM for customer satisfaction using R.
SEM in Mplus
Advanced modeling of SEM with latent variables and complex data structures in Mplus.
Example: Estimating a multilevel SEM in Mplus for educational research.
Section 13: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Summary of Key Concepts in SEM
Recap of measurement and structural models, estimation techniques, and hypothesis testing in SEM.
Best Practices for SEM Estimation and Interpretation
Guidelines for specifying and interpreting SEM models.
Future Directions in SEM Research
Discussion of emerging trends: SEM with machine learning, big data, and new statistical advancements.
Sách
Bài báo
Phần mềm
Stata: sem - Structural equation modeling (link)
Stata: gsem — Generalized structural equation model estimation command
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Simultaneous Equations Models (SEM) in Panel Data
Why Use SEM with Panel Data?
Benefits of using SEM with panel data: Accounting for dynamic relationships, individual heterogeneity, and complex feedback loops.
Example: Simultaneous modeling of investment and output across firms over time.
Section 2: Model Specification for Simultaneous Equations in Panel Data
Structural Equations in Panel Data
Defining structural equations for panel data: Simultaneous determination of multiple endogenous variables.
Example: A model of demand and supply for labor across multiple regions over several years.
Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects in SEM
Explanation of fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) models in panel SEM.
Decision-making criteria: When to use FE or RE models, using the Hausman test to decide.
Individual and Time Effects in Panel SEM
Understanding how individual (cross-sectional) and time-specific effects are treated in SEM.
Example: Incorporating both firm-specific and time-specific effects in an investment model.
Error Components in Panel SEM
Structure of error terms: Cross-sectional and time-series error components.
Example: Modeling errors with firm-level shocks and time-varying economic conditions.
Section 3: Identification of Simultaneous Equations in Panel Data
Identification in Panel SEM
Conditions for identification: Rank and order conditions.
Why identification is crucial in SEM: Ensuring unique parameter estimates.
Over-Identification in Panel SEM
Dealing with over-identification: The need for valid instrumental variables.
Example: Identifying simultaneous relationships between wages and employment in panel data.
Section 4: Estimation Techniques for Simultaneous Equations in Panel Data
Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) in Panel Data
Introduction to 2SLS for addressing endogeneity: Using instrumental variables.
Application to panel data: Estimating relationships when some variables are endogenous.
Example: Estimating labor supply and demand equations using 2SLS in a panel setting.
Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) in Panel Data
Explanation of 3SLS: Simultaneous estimation of equations while accounting for cross-equation correlations.
Application to panel data: Incorporating both fixed effects and simultaneous feedback loops.
Example: Estimating the simultaneous determination of wages and productivity across firms using 3SLS.
Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for Panel Data
Overview of GMM for dynamic SEM in panel data: Moment conditions and instrumenting endogenous variables.
Difference GMM and system GMM approaches in dynamic panel SEM.
Example: Estimating investment and output using system GMM with panel data from multiple firms.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) for Panel SEM
Using MLE for estimating simultaneous equations in panel data: Accounting for heteroskedasticity and cross-equation correlations.
Example: Maximum likelihood estimation of a model of firm-level output and labor costs across multiple years.
Section 5: Dynamic Simultaneous Equations in Panel Data
Introduction to Dynamic Panel SEM
Incorporating time dynamics: Lagged endogenous variables and feedback effects over time.
Why dynamic SEM is useful in panel data: Capturing long-term and short-term effects in the system.
Example: Dynamic SEM of output, investment, and productivity over time.
Arellano-Bond Estimation for Dynamic Panel Data SEM
Using Arellano-Bond for dynamic SEM in panel data: Addressing endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity.
Example: Dynamic modeling of GDP growth and investment using lagged variables.
System GMM for Dynamic SEM
Explanation of system GMM: Estimating dynamic relationships with better handling of endogeneity.
Example: Dynamic SEM for export and production decisions across countries using system GMM.
Section 6: Dealing with Endogeneity in Panel SEM
Endogeneity in Panel Data SEM
Sources of endogeneity in panel data: Simultaneity, omitted variables, and measurement error.
Example: Endogeneity between labor demand and wages in a multi-year panel of firms.
Instrumental Variables in Panel SEM
Choosing valid instruments: Ensuring exogeneity of instruments for panel SEM.
Example: Instrumenting wages with industry-level shocks in a wage determination system.
Testing for Endogeneity in Panel SEM
Using the Hausman test and Sargan-Hansen test to detect endogeneity in panel SEM models.
Example: Testing endogeneity in a simultaneous model of inflation and unemployment with panel data.
Section 7: Hypothesis Testing and Diagnostics in Panel SEM
Hypothesis Testing in Simultaneous Equations Models for Panel Data
Wald test, Likelihood Ratio test, and Lagrange Multiplier test for model diagnostics.
Example: Testing cross-equation restrictions in a simultaneous model of firm output and labor input.
Testing Over-Identification in Panel SEM
Using Sargan and Hansen tests to assess the validity of instruments in panel SEM.
Example: Over-identification tests in a panel model of consumption and income across countries.
Testing for Serial Correlation and Heteroskedasticity
Breusch-Godfrey test for serial correlation and Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity.
Example: Checking for serial correlation in a panel SEM of healthcare expenditure and economic growth.
Section 8: Practical Applications of Simultaneous Equations Models in Panel Data
Application 1: Investment and Production in Firms
Example: Estimating the simultaneous relationship between investment and production decisions across firms using panel data.
Application 2: Supply and Demand in Agriculture
Example: Modeling supply and demand in the agricultural sector using panel data from multiple regions over time.
Application 3: Wage Determination and Employment
Example: Estimating a simultaneous system of wage determination and employment levels across industries using panel data.
Section 9: Software Implementation for Panel SEM
Implementing Panel SEM in Stata
Using Stata’s xtivreg, xtabond, and reg3 commands for estimating simultaneous equations in panel data.
Step-by-step guide for estimating a dynamic SEM in Stata using 2SLS and GMM.
Implementing Panel SEM in R
Using the plm, systemfit, and gmm packages in R for panel SEM estimation.
Example: Estimating a dynamic simultaneous equation system for firm growth and investment in R.
Implementing Panel SEM in EViews
Tools in EViews for estimating panel SEM: Dynamic SEM and simultaneous equations modeling.
Example: Estimating a simultaneous system of output and investment using EViews.
Section 10: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Summary of Key Concepts in Simultaneous Equations Models in Panel Data
Recap of identification, estimation methods, and dealing with endogeneity in panel SEM.
Best Practices for Panel SEM Estimation and Model Validation
Guidelines for choosing estimation techniques, validating models, and addressing model diagnostics in panel SEM.
Future Trends in Panel SEM Research
Discussion of advanced topics: Non-linear panel SEM, Bayesian methods in panel SEM, and applications in machine learning.
Sách
Bài báo
Hsiao, C., & Zhou, Q. (2015). Statistical inference for panel dynamic simultaneous equations models. Journal of Econometrics, 189(2), 383-396.
Alsaleh, M., Abdul-Rahim, A. S., & Mohd-Shahwahid, H. O. (2017). An empirical and forecasting analysis of the bioenergy market in the EU28 region: Evidence from a panel data simultaneous equation model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 1123-1137.
Cai, L. (2010). The relationship between health and labour force participation: Evidence from a panel data simultaneous equation model. Labour Economics, 17(1), 77-90.
Tripathi, J. S. (2023). Trade-growth nexus: A study of G20 countries using simultaneous equations model with dynamic policy simulations. Journal of Policy Modeling, 45(4), 806-816.
Nội dung
Section 1: Introduction to Simultaneous Equations Models (SEM) with Spatial Data
Definition of SEM: A system of equations where multiple endogenous variables are simultaneously determined; Importance of SEM in econometrics: Dealing with endogeneity and capturing feedback loops.
Definition of spatial data: Data that includes a geographical or spatial dimension (e.g., location-specific variables)
Examples: Regional economic data, neighborhood data, geographical data, and environmental variables.
Why Use SEM with Spatial Data?
Benefits of combining SEM and spatial data: Capturing spatial dependencies, spillover effects, and local interactions.
Example: Simultaneously modeling regional unemployment and wage determination while accounting for spatial dependencies.
Section 2: Spatial Econometrics Basics
Overview of Spatial Dependence and Spatial Heterogeneity
Definition of spatial dependence: When the value of a variable in one location depends on values in neighboring locations.
Spatial heterogeneity: Variation in relationships between variables across different regions.
Spatial Weights Matrix
Definition of the spatial weights matrix: A matrix representing the spatial relationship between different units (e.g., regions, countries).
Types of spatial weights matrices: Contiguity matrix, distance matrix, inverse distance matrix.
Example: Constructing a spatial weights matrix for counties or provinces.
Key Spatial Models
Spatial autoregressive model (SAR), Spatial error model (SEM), and Spatial Durbin model (SDM).
Example: Estimating a SAR model for regional housing prices.
Section 3: Simultaneous Equations Models (SEM) with Spatial Data
Spatial Simultaneous Equations Models
Extending SEM to include spatial dependencies: Simultaneously modeling spatial and endogenous relationships.
Example: Modeling spatial spillovers in the housing market using SEM with spatial data.
Endogeneity in Spatial Models
The issue of endogeneity in spatial models: Simultaneity in spatial interactions.
Example: Endogeneity between regional GDP and population growth with spatial spillovers.
Model Specification for Spatial SEM
Structural form and reduced form for spatial SEM: Incorporating spatial lags and spatial error terms.
Example: Simultaneously modeling urban land prices and crime rates with spatial dependencies.
Section 4: Identification in Spatial SEM
Identification of Spatial SEM
Order and rank conditions for identification in spatial simultaneous equations models.
Importance of correct identification in spatial SEM to avoid biased parameter estimates.
Example: Identifying a simultaneous system of spatial housing demand and supply equations.
Over-Identification in Spatial SEM
Handling over-identification: The need for valid instruments in spatial SEM.
Example: Identifying and testing for over-identification in a spatial model of regional economic growth.
Section 5: Estimation Techniques for Spatial SEM
Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) for Spatial SEM
Using 2SLS to estimate spatial SEM: Instrumenting endogenous spatial variables.
Example: Estimating a spatial SEM for pollution levels and economic activity using 2SLS.
Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS) for Spatial SEM
Simultaneous estimation of multiple equations and spatial dependencies using 3SLS.
Example: Simultaneous estimation of spatial demand and supply systems in the housing market using 3SLS.
Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for Spatial SEM
Introduction to GMM in spatial SEM: Estimating models with spatial lag and spatial error terms.
Example: Using GMM to estimate spatial spillover effects in a system of regional economic development and infrastructure investment.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) for Spatial SEM
Using MLE for spatial SEM: Estimating parameters in systems with spatial autocorrelation and cross-equation dependence.
Example: MLE estimation of a spatial SEM for neighborhood crime rates and housing values.
Section 6: Dynamic Spatial Simultaneous Equations Models
Dynamic Spatial SEM
Incorporating temporal dynamics into spatial SEM: Using lagged dependent variables and spatial lags over time.
Example: Dynamic spatial SEM for regional GDP and investment growth.
Estimating Dynamic Spatial SEM with GMM
Using GMM to estimate dynamic spatial models: Addressing both time dynamics and spatial spillovers.
Example: Dynamic modeling of spatial wage disparities and employment growth across regions using GMM.
Section 7: Testing and Diagnostics in Spatial SEM
Testing for Spatial Dependence
Moran’s I test, Lagrange Multiplier tests, and robust LM tests for detecting spatial dependence.
Example: Testing for spatial dependence in a simultaneous system of crime rates and property prices.
Testing for Endogeneity in Spatial SEM
Hausman test for endogeneity in spatial SEM.
Example: Testing for endogeneity in a spatial model of pollution and economic output.
Goodness-of-Fit and Model Diagnostics for Spatial SEM
R-squared, log-likelihood, AIC/BIC, and spatial diagnostics for model evaluation.
Example: Evaluating model fit in a spatial SEM for education outcomes and labor market performance.
Section 8: Practical Applications of Spatial SEM
Application 1: Urban Housing Markets
Example: Estimating the simultaneous relationship between housing demand and supply across cities with spatial dependencies.
Application 2: Regional Economic Growth
Example: Simultaneous modeling of regional economic growth and infrastructure investment with spatial spillover effects.
Application 3: Environmental Pollution and Economic Activity
Example: Estimating a spatial SEM for the relationship between pollution and economic activity across neighboring regions.
Application 4: Public Policy and Crime Rates
Example: Modeling the simultaneous relationship between public policy interventions and crime rates with spatial interactions.
Section 9: Software Implementation for Spatial SEM
Implementing Spatial SEM in Stata
Using Stata’s spreg and ivreg2 commands to estimate spatial SEM.
Step-by-step guide for estimating a spatial SEM for regional GDP and trade.
Implementing Spatial SEM in R
Using the spdep and systemfit packages in R for spatial SEM estimation.
Example: Estimating a spatial SEM for regional housing prices and income levels in R.
Implementing Spatial SEM in MATLAB
MATLAB functions for estimating spatial SEM: Using spatialEconometrics and GMM packages.
Example: Dynamic spatial SEM for crime and economic disparities using MATLAB.
Section 10: Advanced Topics in Spatial SEM
Nonlinear Spatial SEM
Extending SEM to nonlinear models with spatial interactions.
Example: Nonlinear spatial SEM for modeling spatial effects in pollution control policies.
Spatial SEM with Panel Data
Combining spatial SEM with panel data techniques: Accounting for time dynamics and spatial heterogeneity.
Example: Panel data spatial SEM for regional unemployment and wage determination across multiple time periods.
Bayesian Spatial SEM
Bayesian estimation methods for spatial SEM: Incorporating prior information in the estimation process.
Example: Bayesian spatial SEM for environmental quality and regional economic growth.
Section 11: Conclusion and Key Takeaways
Summary of Key Concepts in Spatial SEM
Recap of spatial dependence, estimation methods, and identification in spatial simultaneous equations models.
Best Practices for Spatial SEM Estimation and Interpretation
Guidelines for model specification, spatial weight matrix selection, and interpretation of spatial spillover effects.
Future Directions in Spatial SEM Research
Discussion on emerging topics: Machine learning with spatial SEM, nonparametric methods, and applications in big data.
Sách
Bài báo
Cui, J., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Q. (2024). Investigating the interactive effects between venture capital and urban innovation capabilities: New evidence from a spatial simultaneous equations model. Finance Research Letters, 67, 105957.
Yang, K., & Lee, L. F. (2019). Identification and estimation of spatial dynamic panel simultaneous equations models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 76, 32-46.
Jeanty, P. W., Partridge, M., & Irwin, E. (2010). Estimation of a spatial simultaneous equation model of population migration and housing price dynamics. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 343-352.
Liu, Y., & Hao, Y. (2023). How does coordinated regional digital economy development improve air quality? New evidence from the spatial simultaneous equation analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118235.
Rosburg, A., Isakson, H., Ecker, M., & Strauss, T. (2017). Beyond standardized test scores: The impact of a public school closure on house prices. Journal of Housing Research, 26(2), 119-135.
Phần mềm